Federal Court Rules
Federal Tort Claims Act
FTCAWaives the federal government's sovereign immunity for certain tort claims against federal employees acting within the scope of their employment.
Overview
The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), enacted in 1946 and codified at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 1402(b), 2401(b), and 2671–2680, is the principal mechanism by which an injured person may sue the United States for the negligent or wrongful acts of federal employees. Before the FTCA, sovereign immunity barred most tort suits against the federal government, leaving claimants to pursue private bills in Congress for individual relief. The FTCA waived that immunity in defined circumstances and channeled claims into federal district court.
The statute operates as a limited consent to suit. Under § 1346(b), the United States is liable for personal injury, property damage, and wrongful death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of a federal employee acting within the scope of employment, under circumstances in which a private person would be liable to the claimant under the law of the place where the act or omission occurred. The 'law of the place' phrase makes state tort law the substantive source of liability — federal law supplies only the waiver of immunity and the procedural framework.
FTCA claims are subject to a strict administrative-exhaustion requirement under § 2675(a). Before filing suit, the claimant must present an administrative claim in writing to the appropriate federal agency within two years of the claim's accrual. The agency has six months to deny the claim or make a final disposition. Only after the agency denies the claim, or six months passes without a final disposition, may the claimant file suit in federal district court — and suit must be filed within six months of the agency's denial. These deadlines are jurisdictional and unforgiving.
Section 2680 carves out broad exceptions to the FTCA's waiver of immunity. The most important is the discretionary-function exception under § 2680(a), which preserves immunity for acts based on the exercise or performance of a discretionary function. Other exceptions include claims arising from postal mishandling, tax assessment and collection, intentional torts (with exceptions for assaults, batteries, and false arrests by law-enforcement officers under the law-enforcement proviso), claims from foreign-country torts, and combatant activities of the military during war.
FTCA cases are tried to the bench, not a jury, under § 2402. Damages are limited to actual compensatory damages — punitive damages are barred under § 2674. Pre-judgment interest is also unavailable. Successful FTCA claimants may obtain substantial recoveries when the underlying tort is severe, but the procedural and substantive limits make FTCA litigation a specialized area requiring early attention to administrative deadlines.
Key Provisions
Confers exclusive jurisdiction on the United States district courts over civil actions on claims against the United States for money damages for injury, loss of property, personal injury, or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act of a federal employee acting within the scope of employment, applying the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.
Defines key FTCA terms including 'federal agency' (excluding contractors and most government corporations), 'employee of the government' (covering officers and employees of executive departments, the military, and certain federal contractors performing investigative or law-enforcement functions), and 'acting within the scope of employment' (looking to state agency law).
Requires presentation of the claim in writing to the appropriate federal agency before suit may be brought. The agency has six months to act; if it denies the claim or fails to act within six months, the claimant may then file suit. This administrative-exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional.
Lists thirteen categories of claims for which the FTCA waiver does not apply, including the discretionary-function exception under § 2680(a) (preserving immunity for policy-based decisions), intentional torts under § 2680(h) (with a law-enforcement officer proviso), and combatant activities of the military under § 2680(j).
Sets two strict deadlines: an administrative claim must be filed within two years of the claim's accrual, and suit must be filed within six months of the agency's final denial. Missing either deadline bars the claim entirely.
Procedure Flow
File SF-95 Administrative Claim
Within two years of the injury, the claimant submits Standard Form 95 (or equivalent written claim) to the agency whose employee allegedly caused the harm, including a sum certain demand for damages.
Agency Investigation and Disposition
The agency has six months to investigate, settle, or deny the claim. Many agencies have internal review procedures and may request additional information from the claimant.
Final Denial or Six-Month Lapse
If the agency denies the claim, the claimant has six months from the date of the denial letter to file suit. If six months pass without a final disposition, the claimant may treat the inaction as a denial and file suit.
Federal District Court Litigation
Suit is filed in federal district court for the district where the act or omission occurred or where the plaintiff resides. The case proceeds under the FRCP, with state tort law supplying the substantive standards. There is no right to a jury trial.
Bench Trial and Judgment
The case is tried to the court. Damages are limited to compensatory damages; punitive damages and pre-judgment interest are barred. The judgment is paid from the Judgment Fund administered by the Department of the Treasury.
Common Issues to Watch
- Filing suit before exhausting the administrative claim under § 2675, resulting in dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
- Missing the two-year deadline to file the administrative claim or the six-month deadline to file suit after denial.
- Failing to specify a 'sum certain' on the SF-95, which can render the administrative claim insufficient and bar suit.
- Pleading claims that fall within the discretionary-function exception under § 2680(a), such as challenges to agency policy decisions.
- Suing the wrong agency or naming the federal employee individually instead of the United States.
- Demanding more in litigation than was claimed administratively without satisfying the newly-discovered-evidence or intervening-fact exceptions in § 2675(b).
Official Source
Frequently Asked Questions
Other Federal Rules Hubs
Last reviewed: 2026-05-02
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.