Skip to main content

Stephen Markman

Born 6/4/1949

Judicial Career

  • judMICH
    1/1/1999present
  • jud
    1/1/19981/1/1998

Biography

American judge

Stephen J. Markman (born June 4, 1949) is a former justice of the Michigan Supreme Court . He was appointed by Republican governor John Engler on October 1, 1999, to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Justice James H. Brickley .

Education

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Markman&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Education")
]

Markman received his Bachelor of Arts from Duke University in 1971, and he graduated from University of Cincinnati Law School in 1974.

Career

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Markman&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Career")
]

Markman served as Chief Counsel of the United States Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution and as deputy chief counsel of the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary from 1978 to 1985. He was then nominated to be a United States Assistant Attorney General , heading the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy , by President Ronald Reagan and confirmed by the Senate . While serving as assistant attorney general, his office wrote a recommendation regarding the issue of possible reconsideration of the _Miranda v. Arizona _ decision by the U.S. Supreme Court . When the Chicago Tribune criticized the recommendation, Markman responded with an opinion piece which the paper published entitled In Defense of Reconsidering Miranda; in this op-ed column, Markman argued for a more flexible interpretation of Miranda to bolster fair treatment of suspects in custody. He wrote:

The detailed report setting out my office's recommendations emphasized that changes in Miranda should be approached in the context of a general rethinking of policies concerning the questioning of suspects, which could include such reforms as videotaping or recording interrogations, imposing definite time limits on questioning, and prescribing specific rules concerning behavior and demeanor in questioning suspects. Measures like these would go far beyond the Miranda rules in ensuring fair treatment of suspects, but would predictably carry lesser costs to the public`s interest in effective police investigation. Conversely, no real progress can be expected in promoting either of these objectives in the context of custodial questioning so long as the myth persists that the specific procedures suggested in the Miranda decision must be regarded, for unexplained reasons, as sacrosanct and immutable.

After being nominated by George H. W. Bush and approved by the United States Senate, Markman served as a United States Attorney in Michigan from 1989 to 1993. He joined the private sector firm of Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone in Detroit, where he practiced until he was appointed to the 4th District Michigan Court of Appeals by Governor John Engler in 1995. He held that position until 1999, when Governor Engler appointed him to the Michigan Supreme Court. Michigan voters elected him to the position in 2000.

Since 1993, Markman has taught constitutional law at Hillsdale College, where he holds the title of distinguished visiting professor of Politics.

Markman has contributed to numerous legal publications and was a contributing editor at National Review . He is a Fellow of the Michigan Bar Foundation, a Master of the Bench of the Inns of Court . Markman was sent to Ukraine by the State Department to assist in developing the country's post-Soviet constitution.

Markman was re-elected as Supreme Court judge in 2004 and 2012.

Markman served as chief justice in 2017 and 2018. He did not seek another two years in 2019, and was replaced by Bridget Mary McCormack . Markman's term on the Supreme Court was up for re-election in 2020. However, Markman was ineligible to run due to Michigan's Constitution prohibiting judges that are 70 or older running for office. Markman was 71 in November 2020.

Judicial philosophy

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Markman&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: Judicial philosophy")
]

Markman has argued against an increased role by the judiciary in matters of public policy and suggested that unless citizens engage in a constitutional debate, public matters will be increasingly decided by judges. In 2008, Markman wrote a piece for the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy saying, "[T]he Michigan Supreme Court has set as its priority the proper exercise of the 'judicial power,' to read the law evenhandedly and give it meaning by assessing its words, its grammar and syntax, its context, and its legislative purpose. The court's dominant premise has been on 'getting the law right'—moving toward the best and most faithful interpretation of the law—rather than reflexively acquiescing in prior case law that essentially reflected little more than the personal preferences of predecessor justices."

In April 2010, Markman published an essay in Hillsdale College 's monthly publication, Imprimis, in which he argued against a living constitution with expanded input from judicial governance. Markman prefers an interpretation closer to the 1787 Constitution, and predicts that unless citizens act, justices making under-the-radar decisions on "forgettable and mundane disputes" (as opposed to high–profile decisions such as Roe v. Wade ) will steer public policy in directions of their choosing in such areas as "racial quotas, social services funding, and immigration policy." Markman prefers that public policy decisions be made by legislators instead of judges.

Notable Supreme Court decisions

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Markman&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: Notable Supreme Court decisions")
]

Domestic partner benefits

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Markman&action=edit&section=5 "Edit section: Domestic partner benefits")
]

In _Pride at Work v. Governor of Michigan _, the Michigan Supreme Court, in a 5–2 ruling, ruled that Michigan's 2004 gay marriage ban also bars same-sex domestic partners of public employees from receiving health insurance benefits. Markman wrote the majority opinion for the court where he said that while "marriages and domestic partnerships aren't identical, they are similar."

Ballot petition signatures

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Markman&action=edit&section=6 "Edit section: Ballot petition signature

Biographical content from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

Recent opinions

View all →

Matches based on last-name occurrence in the case's judges field; broader than authored-opinions.

Sourced from CourtListener people-db (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.