EPA v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER
Case summary
MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS-- 1 EGR-1994 RCR2.5V56EEA CERTIFICATE OF COMFORMITY NEVER ISS UED. VEHICLES WERE NON-EGR,NOT FULLY DISCLOSED. 2 NEON PRERELEASE---RELEASE OF VEHICLES PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OFRUNNING CHANGE. BELVIDERE PLANT & TOLUCA PLANT SELF DIS CLOSED ON 8/13/97. 3 EVAP CANNISTER---EDIR NOT SUBMITTED UNTIL AFTER RECALL CO MPLETE, WELL AFTER IT COULD HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. 4 ROLLOVER VALVE---EDIR NOT SUBMITTED UNTIL AFTER RECALL CO MPLETE, WELL AFTER IT COULD HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED.
Defendants (1)
- DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
DAIMLER CHRYSLER - CHRYSLER CENTER
1200 CHRYSLER DR BLDG 144, HIGHLAND PARK, MI, 48203
Registry ID: 110000858135
Statutes cited
- CAA 203 — Prohibited Acts - Motor Vehicle & Motor Vehicle Engines
Enforcement conclusions (3)
Daimler Chryslerentered 2002-11-19
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $200,000
Daimler Chrysler Notice of Determinationentered 2002-11-19
Primary law: CAA
Daimler Chrysler Corporationentered 2002-11-19
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $200,000
Timeline (2 milestones)
- 2000-06-08Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2002-11-19Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 57737
- Case number
- HQ-2000-0071
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- MOB
- Branch
- WFO
- EPA region
- HQ
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- Yes
- Primary statute
- Prohibited Acts - Motor Vehicle & Motor Vehicle Engines
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case HQ-2000-0071 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.