EPA v. P&J DELI MART (FIELD CITATION) (RCRA UST)
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
Ball float devices used for overfill prevention could not be tested because the vapor adopters were seized up. Additionally, there were no Class C Operators associated with the facility. The facility upgraded to an overfill alarm and trained Class C Operators.
Defendants (1)
- P&J DELI MARTNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
P&J DELI MART
3535 E. PORTLAND AVE., TACOMA, WA, 98404
Registry ID: 110015443947
Statutes cited
- RCRA 9003 — UST Release Detection, Prevention, Correction Regulations
Enforcement conclusions (1)
P&J DELI MART (FIELD CITATION) (RCRA UST)entered 2025-07-08
Primary law: RCRA
Federal penalty: $645
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2025-07-08Final Order Issued
- 2025-07-08Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2025-07-22Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3604464872
- Case number
- 10-2025-0154
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 10
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- UST Release Detection, Prevention, Correction Regulations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 10-2025-0154 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.