EPA v. Oregon Cherry Growers, Inc.

Case summary

Did not use the most recent census data, or other updated information to estimate the population. [68.30(c)]. Did not estimate the population to two significant digits. [68.30(d)]. Did not document the methodology used to etermine distance to endpoints. [68.39(d)]. Did not document the data used to estimate population and environmental receptors potentially affected. [68.39(e)] Did not ensured the frequency of inspections and tests of process equipment is consistent with applicable manufacturers’ recommendations, good engineering practices, and prior operating experience. [68.73(d)(3)] The owner or operator has not certified that the stationary source has evaluated compliance with the provisions of the prevention program at least every three years to verify that the developed procedures and practices.

Defendants (1)

• Oregon Cherry Growers, Inc.Named in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• OREGON CHERRY GROWERS

  101 MADISON ST, THE DALLES, OR, 97058

  Registry ID: 110000601439

Statutes cited

• CAA 112[R][7] — Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• Oregon Cherry Growers, Inc.entered 2009-03-19

  Primary law: CAA

  Federal penalty: $998

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 2009-03-02Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2009-03-19Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2009-03-19Final Order Issued
• 2009-04-02Enforcement Action Closed