Skip to main content
10-2007-0063Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2007· Region 10

EPA v. MT HOOD CHEMICAL (MICRO ONE)

Final Order No Penalty

Case summary

On March 25, 2005, the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) conducted a producer establishment inspection of Mt. Hood Chemical Corporation. The ODA inspection report was sent to EPA Region 10 where it was reviewed for violations. Upon review it was found that 13 of the 14 pesticide products inspected by ODA were in violation of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. The violations included labels with missing statements, out of data labeling, labeling that was pieced together from a combination of out of date and updated labels and some directions that did not match the EPA accepted labels. The 11 products that are included in the Stop Sale Use or Removal Order were the products with the worst violations. These included out of date first aid statements, altered environmental hazard statements and altered and/or out of date directions for use. To ensure human safety and that the environment EPA has been issued this stop sale in order to curb the distribution of product with improper directions for use, first aid and environmental hazard statements. The SSUROs contains the specific violations on each label and a cover letter with an information request was also sent to help determine who is at fault for the multiple FIFRA violations.

Defendants (1)

  • MT. HOOD CHEMICALSNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • MT. HOOD CHEMICAL

    4444 NW YEON AVE, PORTLAND, OR, 97210

    Registry ID: 110000487376

Statutes cited

  • FIFRA 12A1BClaim Difference
  • FIFRA 12A1AUnregistered Pesticide

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • MT HOOD CHEMICAL (MICRO ONE)entered 2006-12-14

    Primary law: FIFRA

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 2006-12-14Final Order Issued
  • 2007-04-03Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2007-04-16Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
600035388
Case number
10-2007-0063
Lead agency
EPA
EPA region
10
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Claim Difference

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 10-2007-0063 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.