EPA v. BHS MARKETING - NAMPA
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
The owner or operator of a stationary source shall revise and upae the RMP submitted at least once every 5 years from the date of its initial submission or most recent update requried by paragraphs (b)(2) through (b)(7) of 40 CFR Sec 68.190 whichever is later. BHS Marketing-Nampa's original RMP was submitted on 6/17/99. The RMP was not updated and resubmitted by the 6/17/2004 deadline (Sec 68.190(b)(1).
Defendants (1)
- MICHAEL MERLONamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
BHS MARKETING
1717 E FARGO ST, NAMPA, ID, 83687
Registry ID: 110000468663
Statutes cited
- CAA 112[R][7] — Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
Enforcement conclusions (1)
BHS MARKETING - NAMPAentered 2006-02-03
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $1,200
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 2006-02-03Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2006-02-03Final Order Issued
- 2006-02-03Expedited Settlement Offered
- 2006-03-28Enforcement Action Closed
- 2006-03-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 172509
- Case number
- 10-2006-0097
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 10
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 10-2006-0097 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.