Skip to main content
10-1994-0218JudicialClosedFY 1994· Region 10

EPA v. QUEEN CITY FARMS - BOEING RD/RA CD

Unknown

Case summary

THE QUEEN CITY FARMS SITE CONTAINS 320 ACRES AND IS LOCATED IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. IT CONSISTS OF SIX FORMER WASTE PONDS, A GRAVEL PIT, THE FORMER QUEEN CITY AIRSTRIP, FORMER 4-TEK INDUSTRIES FACILITY (USED TO RECYCLE SOLVENTS), A SEASONAL LAKE AND A COMPOSTING FACILITY OPERATED BY CEDAR GROVE COMPOSTING. BOEING IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING SOLVENT AND JET FUEL WASTES TO THE SITE. THERE IS NO ESTIMATE OF ITS VOLUME. BOEING IS WILLING TO CONDUCT THE RD/RA WORK FOR THE SITE, AT BOEING'S EXPENSE, EXCLUDING THE 4-TEK FACILILTY.

Defendants (1)

  • THE BOEING COMPANYNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • CEDAR GROVE COMPOSTING INC

    17825 CEDAR GROVE RD SE, MAPLE VALLEY, WA, 98038

    Registry ID: 110005405285

Statutes cited

  • CERCLA 107ACost Recovery
  • RCRA 7003Imminent Order: Solid or Hazardous Waste
  • CERCLA 106AImminent & Substantial Endangerment Order

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • QUEEN CITY FARMS - BOEINGentered 1994-09-09

    Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (7 milestones)

  • 1992-01-01Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 1993-12-15Referred To Dept Of Justice
  • 1994-05-16Complaint Filed With Court
  • 1994-09-09Final Order Lodged
  • 1994-09-09Final Order Entered
  • 1994-09-09Concluded
  • 2001-05-01Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
55053
Case number
10-1994-0218
DOJ docket
90-11-3-1150
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
CER
Branch
HAZ2
EPA region
10
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Cost Recovery

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 10-1994-0218 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.