EPA v. ARMOUR FRESH MEATS CO & CON AGRA INC
Final Order With Penalty
Penalty assessed
$150,000
Case summary
ARMOUR FRESH MEATS CO (ARMOUR), A SUBSIDIARY OF CON AGRA INC, OPERATES A COMPLEX SLAUGHTERHOUSE AND MEAT PROCESSING FACILITY IMMEDIATELY EAST OF NAMPA, ID. ON THE MORNING OF 1/31/86, A BREACH OCCURRED IN A WASTE TREATMENT POND ADJACENT TO THE PACKING PLANT ALLOWING A DISCHARGE OF APPROXIMATELY 6.7 MILLION GALLONS OF PARTIALLY-TREATED PROCESS WASTEWATER AND SLUDGE INTO INDIAN CREEK, A SMALL WATERCOURSE. THIS DISCHARGE CAUSED SEVERE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO THE RESIDENT FISHERY AND OTHER BIOTA IN INDIAN CREEK FROM THE ARMOUR PLANT SITE THROUGH NAMPA AND CALDWELL, ID, TO THE BOISE RIVER, ABOUT 12 MILES DOWNSTREAM. ALTHOUGH ARMOUR WAS AWARE OF THE IMMEDIATE DAMAGE AND WAS AWARE THAT THEIR DISCHARGE WAS OF CONTINUING NATURE, COMPANY OFFICIALS POSTPONED THE CESSATION OF PRODUCTION UNTIL APPROXIMATELY 7 PM ON 1/31/86. PRODUCTION DISCHARGE CONTINUED UNTIL ABOUT 4 PM ON 2/1/86 AT WHICH TIME ARMOUR COMPLETED TEMPORARY REPAIR OF THE BREACHED DIKE. IN PART, THE DISCHARGE CONTINUED BECAUSE OF PLANT CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS REQUIRED BY USDA REGULATIONS. ARMOUR'S TREATMENT FACILITIES WERE INSPECTED 1/8, 1/9, 1/22, 1/31, 2/1, 2/2, 2/4, 2/18, 2/21, 4/3, 4/23, 4/28, 5/2/86. SAMPLES WERE TAKEN DURING THE MAJORITY OF THESE INSPECTIONS, AND REVEALED THAT VIOLATIONS OF ARMOUR'S NPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS WERE OCCURRING IN THE EFFLUENT STREAM. IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE INSPECTORS, THE FACILITY WAS HYDRAULICALLY AND ORGANICALLY OVERLOADED, UNDERSTAFFED, AND INADEQUATELY OPERATED AND MAINTAINED. ON 1/9/86 AN EPA INSPECTOR OBSERVED THAT SOLIDS HAD BEEN PUMPED FROM THE CHLORINE CONTACT CHAMBER ONTO THE GROUND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO AND HYDRAULICALLY CONNECTED WITH INDIAN CREEK. ALSO OBSERVED ON THIS DATE WAS THE RESIDUE FROM A SPILL OF MANURE WHICH RESULTED FROM A LINE BREAK. THE RESIDUE WAS LOCATED IN THE IMMEDIATE PROXIMITY TO THE CREEK, LEADING THE INSPECTOR TO BELIEVE THAT THE MANURE SPILLAGE REACHED AND ENTERED INDIAN CREEK DUE TO THE EXTREMELY CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE WATER AND DUE TO THE SNOW MELT. A REPRESENTATIVE OF ARMOUR INDICATED THAT THE SPILL HAD OCCURRED ON 1/7/86. BOTH OF THESE DISCHARGES ENTERED INDIAN CREEK, YET NEITHER WAS AUTHORIZED OR REPORTED IN WRITING AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT. ARMOUR'S TREATMENT FACILITY DISCHARGES HAVE VIOLATED THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE NPDES PERMIT IN THAT THE EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS HAVE BEEN REPEATEDLY EXCEEDED. THE DIRECT DISCHARGE FROM THE BREACHED POND CONSTITUTED A VIOLA- TION OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IN THAT IT WAS NOT AUTHORIZED BY AN NPDES PERMIT. THIS CASE SEEKS AN INJUNCTION AGAINST FURTHER SUCH DISCHARGES AND CIVIL PENALTIES FOR PAST VIOLA- TIONS.
Defendants (2)
- ARMOUR FRESH MEATS CONamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- CON AGRA INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (2)
SWIFT & COMPANY BEEF
3611 E AMITY AVE, NAMPA, ID, 83653
Registry ID: 110000468627
SWIFT & COMPANY BEEF
3611 E AMITY AVE, NAMPA, ID, 83653
Registry ID: 110000468627
Statutes cited
- CWA 309 — Violation of Existing AO
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
ARMOUR FRESH MEATS/CON AGRAentered 1989-05-30
Primary law: CWA
Federal penalty: $150,000
Timeline (9 milestones)
- 1986-03-15Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1986-07-22Referred To Headquarters
- 1986-09-02Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1986-11-12Referred TO U.S. Attorney
- 1986-12-05Complaint Filed With Court
- 1989-05-30Final Order Lodged
- 1989-05-30Final Order Entered
- 1989-05-30Concluded
- 1990-01-02Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 54028
- Case number
- 10-1986-0010
- DOJ docket
- 90-5-1-1-2730
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- EPA region
- 10
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Violation of Existing AO
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 10-1986-0010 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.