EPA v. Puroflo Water Filter Model no. 11-AIC-RO-PURO/NSF (COVID-19)
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (EPA) is informing the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (CBP) that the following pesticide device import products in the shipment should be Denied Entry-Refused Delivery into the United States pursuant to the authority of Section 17(c) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. Section136o(c), and the implementing regulations at 19 C.F.R. Section 12.114. The entry was marked Refused in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE).
Defendants (1)
- Puregen Technology IncNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
PUREGEN TECHNOLOGY INC
5423 G STREET, CHINO, CA, 91710
Registry ID: 110071537727
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Puroflo Water Filter Model no. 11-AIC-RO-PURO/NSF (COVID-19)entered 2023-11-03
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2023-11-03Enforcement Action Closed
- 2023-11-03Final Order Issued
- 2023-11-16Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3603787186
- Case number
- 09-2024-4327
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 09
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Device Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 09-2024-4327 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.