EPA v. Hasa Inc., Pittsburg, CA, CAA112(r)(7) ESA
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
Hasa Inc at its Pittsburg CA facility failed to accurately identify the maximum intended inventory of chlorine, as required by CAA section 112(r)7 and 40 C.F.R. § 68.65(c)(1)(iii). Using its Expedited Settlement Agreement (ESA) authority EPA was able to offer Hasa, Inc. reduced civil penalties totaling $600.
Defendants (1)
- Hasa, Inc.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
HASA INC
1251 LOVERIDGE RAOD, PITTSBURG, CA, 94565
Registry ID: 110009528092
Statutes cited
- CAA 112[R][7] — Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Hasa Inc., Pittsburg, CA, CAA112(r)(7) ESAentered 2011-08-11
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $600
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2011-08-11Enforcement Action Closed
- 2011-08-11Final Order Issued
- 2011-08-11Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2011-08-17Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 2600045256
- Case number
- 09-2011-3505
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 09
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 09-2011-3505 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.