EPA v. Newmark Superfund Site
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Case summary
From and after the date that the Court enters an order granting a motion to approve this Joint Stipulation: 1) the amounts funded from the O&M Escrow for development and management of the Groundwater Model and implementation for Section IX of the Consent Decree (Access and Institutional Controls), Paragraphs 27-30, 32, and 33, collectively shall not exceed $3,000,000 (three million dollars) Net Present Value (NPV).
Defendants (1)
- United States Department of the ArmyNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
NEWMARK GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION SITE
BUNKER HILL GROUND WATER BASIN, SAN BERNARDINO, CA, 92408
Registry ID: 110009268283
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
- CERCLA 106A — Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
Enforcement conclusions (2)
Newmark Consent Decreeentered 2005-03-23
Primary law: CERCLA
Newmark Superfund Site 2005 CD Modificationentered 2020-08-24
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (8 milestones)
- 2004-08-09Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 2004-08-11Complaint Filed With Court
- 2004-09-02Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2020-08-21Final Order Lodged
- 2020-08-24Enforcement Action Closed
- 2020-08-24Concluded
- 2020-08-24Final Order Entered
- 2020-08-24Consent Decree Amendment
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 126678
- Case number
- 09-2004-0327
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 09
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Cost Recovery
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 09-2004-0327 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.