EPA v. City of Redding
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
'The City of Redding, operating as the Redding Electric Utility (�REU�), owns the Clear Creek facility and the four units therein (Units 1, 2, 3 and 4). Prior to REU�s purchase of the Clear Creek facility, there was one steam turbine (Unit 4) fired by two boilers. EPA has determined that Steam Unit 4 was an exempt cogeneration unit, and that this exemption is still applicable. REU has failed to comply with the requirements of the Acid Rain Program in its operation of Units 1, 2, and 3. Additionally, units 2 and 3 are affected units subject to the requirements of Title IV. Units 2 and 3 each serve a generator with 31,039 KVA at 9 PF, and rated output of 27,750 kW. These units began operation after 1990 (sometime between October 27, 1994 and April 5, 1996) and are thus new utility units which are affected units. 40 C.F.R. ��72.2, 72.6(a)(3)(i).'
Defendants (1)
- City of ReddingNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
REDDING POWER PLANT
17120 CLEAR CREEK ROAD, REDDING, CA, 96001
Registry ID: 110001187876
Statutes cited
- CAA 113A — Violation of Existing Administrative Order
Enforcement conclusions (1)
City of Redding Compliance Orderentered 2002-07-08
Primary law: CAA
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2002-07-08Enforcement Action Closed
- 2002-07-08Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2002-07-08Final Order Issued
- 2002-08-13Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 84707
- Case number
- 09-2002-0058
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 09
- Primary statute
- Violation of Existing Administrative Order
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 09-2002-0058 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.