Skip to main content
09-2001-0054Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2001· Region 09

EPA v. FOSTER J. EXPRESS

Final Order With Penalty

Penalty assessed

$250

Case summary

THIS IS AN UST COMPLAINT CONSENT AGREEMENT/FINAL ORDER (CA/F O). A CA/FO WAS ISSUED FOR THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: FAILUR E TO PROVIDE ANY CORROSION PROTECTION FOR METAL PIPING; FAIL URE TO HAVE AN OVERFILL PREVENTION SYSTEM ON A NEW TANK; FAI LURE TO HAVE SPILL PREVENTION AND OVERFILL PREVENTION SYSTEM ON AN EXISTING TANK; FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE RELEASE DE TECTION METHOD FOR PETROLEUM TANKS; FAILURE TO CONDUCT LINE TIGHTNESS TEST OR USE MONTHLY MONITORING ON SUCTION PIPING; FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Defendants (1)

  • JOHN R. FOSTER D/B/A FOSTER J. EXPRESSNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • JOHN R. FOSTER D/B/A FOSTER J. EXPRESS

    SATALA VILLAGE, PAGO PAGO, AS, 96799

    Registry ID: 110028228380

Statutes cited

  • RCRA 9006AUnderground Storage Tanks Compliance Order

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • JOHN R. FOSTER D/B/A FOSTER J. EXPRESSentered 2001-07-03

    Primary law: RCRA

    Federal penalty: $250

Timeline (4 milestones)

  • 2001-07-03Final Order Issued
  • 2001-07-03Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2001-09-27Enforcement Action Closed
  • 2001-09-27Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
53761
Case number
09-2001-0054
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
RCR
EPA region
09
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Underground Storage Tanks Compliance Order

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 09-2001-0054 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.