EPA v. GUAM SANKO TRANSPORTATION (MOBIL OIL)
Final Order With Penalty
Penalty assessed
$300
Case summary
THIS IS A UST FIELD CITATION CASE. A CITATION WAS ISSUED FOR NOT CONDUCTING INVENTORY CONTROL LEAK DETECTION AT THE GUAM SANKO TRANSPORTATION COMPANY FACILITY BY A METHOD ADEQUATE TO DETECT A RELEASE. ONLY DURING MONTH OF THE INSPECTION (11/99) WERE THE CORRECT METHODS USED FOR THE FIRST TIME. MOBIL IS TANK OWNER AND FUEL SUPPLIER TO GUAM SANKO. THE MOBIL REPRESENTATIVE WHO WAS PRESENT AT THE INSPECTION ACCEPTED LIABILITY AND REQUESTED THAT THE FINE BE SENT TO MOBIL. GUAM SANKO CONTRACTS WITH MOBILE TO OPERATE THE TANKS TO FUEL THEIR TOURIST BUSES.
Defendants (2)
- JILL KHOURYNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- MOBIL OIL CO. (MICRONESIA)Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
GUAM SANKO TRANSPORTATION
NEAR MARINE DR (ROUTE 1), TAMUNING, GU, 96931
Registry ID: 110010627296
Statutes cited
- RCRA 9003 — UST Release Detection, Prevention, Correction Regulations
Enforcement conclusions (1)
GUAM SANKO TRANSPORTATION (MOBIL OIL)entered 2000-03-01
Primary law: RCRA
Federal penalty: $300
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 1999-11-16Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2000-03-01Final Order Issued
- 2000-03-01Enforcement Action Closed
- 2000-06-23Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 53312
- Case number
- 09-2000-0040
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- RCR
- Branch
- HAZ.W
- EPA region
- 09
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- UST Release Detection, Prevention, Correction Regulations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 09-2000-0040 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.