EPA v. CONOCO INCORPORATED ET AL.
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
THIS IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO RCRA 7003. THE ORDER HAS BEEN ISSUED TO CONOCO AND TWO OTHER OIL COMPANIES WHICH HAVE OPERATIONS NEAR THE CHARNOCK DRINKING WATER WELLS OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA. IN AUGUST OF 1995, STUDIES FOUND THAT THE GASOLINE ADDITIVE MTBE WAS PRESENT IN THE GROUND NEAR THE DRINKING WATER WELLS. BECAUSE THE RESPONDENTS HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR RELEASES OF MTBE AND OTHER GASOLINE CONSTITUENTS THAT MAY BE CONTRIBUTING TO ENDANGERMENT AT THE WELL FIELDS, THIS ORDER REQUIRES THAT THEY SUPPLEMENT EXISTING INVESTIGATIONS AND INFORMATION REQUETS BY CONDUCTING NEW FIELDWORK AND INFORMATION GATHERING AS SPECIFICALLY DELINEATED IN THE SCOPE OF WORK STATEMENT ATTACHED TO THE ORDER.
Defendants (3)
- CONOCO INCORPORATEDNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- DOUGLAS OIL COMPANYNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- KAYO OILNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
CONOCO STATION #5625
11198 WASHINGTON PLACE, CULVER CITY, CA, 90232
Registry ID: 110010627303
Statutes cited
- RCRA 7003A — Res Conserv & Rec Act
Enforcement conclusions (1)
CONOCO INCORPORATED ET AL.entered 1999-04-20
Primary law: RCRA
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 1999-04-20Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1999-04-20Final Order Issued
- 1999-04-20Enforcement Action Closed
- 1999-10-20Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 53170
- Case number
- 09-1999-0108
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- RCR
- Branch
- HAZ.W
- EPA region
- 09
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Res Conserv & Rec Act
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 09-1999-0108 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.