EPA v. FRANKLIN ELECTRIC (09)
Case summary
These statements demonstrate a pesticidal intent pursuant to the definitions above. Based on the information provided, the Vectamaxx RSR 1200 gpd Systems, the Vectamaxx RSR 2400 gpd Systems and the Vectapure NX RO Systems in the shipment referenced above fall within the definition of devices under FIFRA section 2(h), 7 U.S.C. ? 136(h), and 40 C.F.R ? 152.500(a) as ?any instrument or contrivance (other than a firearm) which is intended for trapping, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest, [which includes virus, bacteria, or other micro-organism,] or any other form of plant or animal life (other than man and other than bacteria, virus, or other microorganism on or in living man or other living animals); but not including equipment used for the application of pesticides when sold separately therefrom.?
Defendants (1)
- Franklin ElectricNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (2)
FRANKLIN ELECTRIC
9333 COVERDALE RD, FORT WAYNE, IN, 46809
Registry ID: 110045476855
FRANKLIN ELECTRIC
9333 COVERDALE RD, FORT WAYNE, IN, 46809
Registry ID: 110045476855
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1E — Adulterated/Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
FRANKLIN ELECTRIC (09)entered 2025-02-19
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (2 milestones)
- 2025-02-19Final Order Issued
- 2025-03-25Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3604333976
- Case number
- 08-2025-0038
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 08
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Adulterated/Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-2025-0038 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.