EPA v. PREMIER HORTICULTURE LTD. (0013)
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
The ProMix FPX Biofungicide is misbranded pursuant to 7 U.S.C. ? 136(q)(1) because it does not bear the registration number assigned under section 7 indicating the establishment in which it was produced. The shipment that arrived at the border for import is also in violation of FIFRA section 12(a)(2)(N), 7 U.S.C. ? 136j(a)(2)(N), because a registrant, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or other distributor failed to file reports required by the Act. As required by 19 C.F.R. ?12.114, a Notice of Arrival of Pesticides and Devices, EPA form 3540-1, and a copy of one product label must be submitted. In ACE the DIS had a label uploaded for the product, that states, ?74267-CAN-001/002/003/004?, without delineating which of those establishments listed is the applicable establishment number. The information in ACE is false.
Defendants (1)
- PREMIER HORTICULTURE LTD.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
PREMIER HORTICULTURE LTD.
200 KELLY ROAD, QUAKERTOWN, PA, 18951
Registry ID: 110070836166
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A2N — Failure to File Reports
- FIFRA 12A1E — Adulterated/Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
PREMIER HORTICULTURE LTD. (0013)entered 2024-02-16
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2024-02-16Final Order Issued
- 2024-02-22Enforcement Action Closed
- 2024-02-27Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3603883469
- Case number
- 08-2024-0037
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 08
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Failure to File Reports
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-2024-0037 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.