EPA v. FLOWATER INC (09)
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
The Water Purifier-Pro 400, Commercial High Flow Units are misbranded pursuant to FIFRA section 2(q)(1), 7 U.S.C. ? 136(q)(1) because there is no EPA Establishment Number, no directions for use, and no caution or warning statements on their labels. Therefore, these products are misbranded pursuant to 7 U.S.C. ? 136(q)(1). Importing the products in the shipment(s) referenced above is a violation of FIFRA section 12(a)(1)(F), 7 U.S.C. ? 136j(a)(1)(F), as a distribution or sale of a misbranded device. The shipment(s) that arrived at the border for import is also in violation of FIFRA section 12(a)(2)(N), 7 U.S.C. ? 136j(a)(2)(N), because a registrant, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or other distributor failed to correctly file reports required by the Act. As required by 19 C.F.R. ? 12.114, a Notice of Arrival of Pesticides and Devices (NOA), EPA form 3540-1, and a copy of one product label must be submitted.
Defendants (1)
- FLOWATER INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
FLOWATER INC
4045 PECOS STREET, DENVER, CO, 80211-2555
Registry ID: 110071537757
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A2N — Failure to File Reports
Enforcement conclusions (1)
FLOWATER INC (09)entered 2024-01-02
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2024-01-02Final Order Issued
- 2024-01-10Enforcement Action Closed
- 2024-01-12Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3603835070
- Case number
- 08-2024-0024
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 08
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Failure to File Reports
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-2024-0024 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.