EPA v. Jay and Kay Company
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
The products are misbranded pursuant to 7 U.S.C. ? 136(q)(1). Importing these products in the shipment referenced above is a violation of FIFRA section 12(a)(1)(F), 7 U.S.C. ? 136j(a)(1)(F), as a distribution or sale of a misbranded device. The shipment that arrived at the border for import is also in violation of FIFRA section 12(a)(2)(N), 7 U.S.C. ? 136j(a)(2)(N), because a registrant, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or other distributor failed to file reports required by the Act. As required by 19 C.F.R. section 12.114, a Notice of Arrival of Pesticides and Devices, EPA form 3540-1, and a copy of one product label must be submitted.
Defendants (1)
- Jay and Kay CompanyNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
JAY AND KAY MANUFACTURING LLC
72 LOUISE ST, CROSWELL, MI, 48422
Registry ID: 110044976103
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Jay and Kay Companyentered 2021-06-29
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2021-06-29Final Order Issued
- 2021-08-02Enforcement Action Closed
- 2021-08-10Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3602794772
- Case number
- 08-2021-0160
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 08
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Device Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-2021-0160 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.