Skip to main content
08-2021-0160Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2021· Region 08

EPA v. Jay and Kay Company

Final Order No Penalty

Case summary

The products are misbranded pursuant to 7 U.S.C. ? 136(q)(1). Importing these products in the shipment referenced above is a violation of FIFRA section 12(a)(1)(F), 7 U.S.C. ? 136j(a)(1)(F), as a distribution or sale of a misbranded device. The shipment that arrived at the border for import is also in violation of FIFRA section 12(a)(2)(N), 7 U.S.C. ? 136j(a)(2)(N), because a registrant, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or other distributor failed to file reports required by the Act. As required by 19 C.F.R. section 12.114, a Notice of Arrival of Pesticides and Devices, EPA form 3540-1, and a copy of one product label must be submitted.

Defendants (1)

  • Jay and Kay CompanyNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • JAY AND KAY MANUFACTURING LLC

    72 LOUISE ST, CROSWELL, MI, 48422

    Registry ID: 110044976103

Statutes cited

  • FIFRA 12A1FDevice Misbranded

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • Jay and Kay Companyentered 2021-06-29

    Primary law: FIFRA

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 2021-06-29Final Order Issued
  • 2021-08-02Enforcement Action Closed
  • 2021-08-10Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
3602794772
Case number
08-2021-0160
Lead agency
EPA
EPA region
08
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Device Misbranded

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-2021-0160 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.