EPA v. TRI PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
During an investigation of a rental property to determine the source of lead exposure in a child with an elevated blood lead level, a Weld County health inspector observed renovation activity at the property that appeared to be out of compliance with the RRP Rule. An employee of the property management company was allegedly removing painted portions of an exterior porch in a home built prior to 1978 without having tested for lead-based paint or utilizing lead-safe work practices. A follow up inspection by the EPA at Respondent?s office confirmed that no certified renovator had been assigned and the firm was not EPA lead-safe certified. Respondent agreed to a penalty, obtained firm certification, and submitted a plan of action to train and certify staff who conduct renovation activities for all of their rental properties.
Defendants (1)
- TRI PROPERTY MANAGEMENTNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
TRI PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
1422 8TH AVE, GREELEY, CO, 80631
Registry ID: 110070739663
Statutes cited
- TSCA 402C — Lead: RRP
Enforcement conclusions (1)
TRI PROPERTY MANAGEMENTentered 2021-04-23
Primary law: TSCA
Federal penalty: $61,500
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2021-04-23Final Order Issued
- 2021-04-23Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2021-05-19Enforcement Action Closed
- 2021-05-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3602719515
- Case number
- 08-2021-0101
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 08
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Lead: RRP
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-2021-0101 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.