EPA v. Allegro Coffee Company
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
The shipment that arrived at the border for import is in violation of FIFRA section 12(a)(2)(N), 7 U.S.C. ? 136j(a)(2)(N), because a registrant, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or other distributor failed to file a report. As required by 19 C.F.R. ?12.114, a Notice of Arrival of Pesticides and Devices, EPA form 3540-1, must be submitted. A Notice of Arrival was not submitted either electronically or via the CBP authorized electronic data interchange system. The shipment that arrived at the border for import was in violation of FIFRA section 12(a)(2)(L), 7 U.S.C. ? 136j(a)(2)(L), which states that it is unlawful for any person who is a producer to violate the provisions of FIFRA section 7(a), 7 U.S.C. ? 136e(a), by producing a pesticide or pesticidal device subject to the Act in an unregistered establishment. 40 C.F.R. ? 167.20. (See 40 C.F.R. section 152.500 for requirements for devices.)
Defendants (1)
- Allegro Coffee CompanyNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
ALLEGRO COFFEE CO
12799 CLAUDE CT, THORNTON, CO, 802413828
Registry ID: 110002373672
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A2L — Establishment Registration
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Allegro Coffee Companyentered 2021-02-25
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2021-02-25Final Order Issued
- 2021-02-27Enforcement Action Closed
- 2021-04-02Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3602473088
- Case number
- 08-2021-0064
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 08
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Establishment Registration
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-2021-0064 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.