EPA v. Rocky Mountain Pipeline
Case summary
This self-disclosure reveals that Rocky Mountain Pipeline may not have properly filed quarterly and annual designate and track reports. Specifically, Rocky Mountain Pipeline can not confirm that the reports were properly filed for its Stroud Pump Station and Pipeline in Cheyenne, and 4 refined product terminals located in Cheyenne, Wyoming; Rapid City, South Dakota; Dupont, Colorado; and Fountain, Colorado.
Defendants (1)
- Rocky Mountain PipelineNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (4)
MAGELLAN PIPELINE-DUPONT TERMINAL
8160 KRAMERIA AVENUE, DUPONT, CO, 80024
Registry ID: 110000738015
MAGELLAN PIPELINE-DUPONT TERMINAL
8160 KRAMERIA AVENUE, DUPONT, CO, 80024
Registry ID: 110000738015
MAGELLAN PIPELINE-DUPONT TERMINAL
8160 KRAMERIA AVENUE, DUPONT, CO, 80024
Registry ID: 110000738015
MAGELLAN PIPELINE-DUPONT TERMINAL
8160 KRAMERIA AVENUE, DUPONT, CO, 80024
Registry ID: 110000738015
Statutes cited
- CAA 211 — Regulation of Fuels - Motor Vehicle and Engine Fuels
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Rocky Mountain Pipelineentered 2009-12-28
Primary law: CAA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2009-12-28Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2009-12-28Final Order Issued
- 2010-04-05Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 1800089980
- Case number
- 08-2010-0062
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 08
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- Yes
- Primary statute
- Regulation of Fuels - Motor Vehicle and Engine Fuels
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-2010-0062 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.