EPA v. Barker-Hughesville Superfund Site
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Case summary
This Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent provides for the performance by Respondent of an Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis for removal of contaminants at the site. The removal action required by this Agreement is necessary to protect the public health, welfare, or the environment.
Defendants (1)
- The Doe Run Resources CorporationNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
BARKER-HUGHESVILLE SUPERFUND SITE
FOREST SERVICE ROAD 6403, GREAT FALLS, MT, 59403
Registry ID: 110009295896
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 122H — Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
- CERCLA 106A — Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Barker-Hughesville Superfund Siteentered 2008-07-21
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2008-07-21Final Order Issued
- 2008-07-21Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2008-09-02Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 1400000978
- Case number
- 08-2008-0207
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 08
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-2008-0207 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.