EPA v. CENTRAL VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION
Case summary
AN INSPECTION CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH CWA REGULATIONS REVEALED THAT THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE NOTICE BEFORE APPLYING SLUDGE, FAILED TO OBTAIN PERMISSION TO EXCEED THE SLUDGE AGRONOMIC LOADING RATE, FAILED TO RE- STRICT ANIMAL GRAZING FOR 30 DAYS AFTER APPLYING SLUDGE, FAILED TO RESTRICT PUBLIC ACCESS FOR AT LEAST 30 DAYS AFTER APPLYING SLUDGE, FAILED TO OBTAIN PERMISSION TO APPLY SLUDGE WITHIN 10 METERS OF WATERS OF THE U.S., FAILED TO DOCUMENT IT'S GIVING AWAY SLUDGE COMPOST, FAILED TO DESCRIBE HOW PATHOGEN REQUIREMENTS WERE MET, FAILED TO MEET RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS ON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND FAILED TO PROVIDE A SIGNED CERTIFICATION STATEMENETS ON IT'S ANNUAL BUDGET.
Defendants (1)
- CENTRAL VALLEY WATER RECLAMATIONNamed in complaint
Facilities (2)
CENTRAL VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
800 WEST CENTRAL VALLEY ROAD, SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 841193379
Registry ID: 110000534681
CENTRAL VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
800 WEST CENTRAL VALLEY ROAD, SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 841193379
Registry ID: 110000534681
Statutes cited
- CWA 311 — Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Timeline (2 milestones)
- 1995-06-19Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1996-02-01Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 50435
- Case number
- 08-1995-0291
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- EPA region
- 08
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-1995-0291 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.