EPA v. WAY OIL COMPANY

Case summary

THIS IS A 7 COUNT COMPLAINT. COUNT 1 & 2 RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE LEAK DETECTION METHODS FOR TANK 1 AND TANK 3'S PRESSURIZED PIPING SYSTEMS. ONE VIO- LATION FOR EACH PIPING SYSTEM COUNT 3 & 4 RESPONDENT FAILED TO NOTIFY THE IMPLEMENTING AGENCY WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DETECTING A FAILED LINE TIGHTNESS TEST ON TANK 1 AND TANK 3. ONE VIOLATION FOR EACH PIPING SYSTEM. COUNT 5 & 6 RESPONDENT FAILED TO REPAIR, REPLACE OR UPGRADE THE PRESSURIZED LINES CONNECTED TO TANK 1 AND TANK 3 WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE DETECTION OF THE FAILED TEST.ONE VIOLATION FOR EACH PIPING SYSTEM. COUNT 7 RESPONDENT FAILED TO CLOSE THE 2 UNDERGROUND STORAGE SYSTEMS(UGS). TOTAL PROPOSED PENALTY $31,645.00

Defendants (1)

• WAY OIL COMPANYNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• COFFEEN TEXACO

  51 COFFEEN AVE, SHERIDAN, WY, 82801

  Registry ID: 110005577642

Statutes cited

• RCRA 9006 — Federal Enforcement: Compliance Orders, Procedure, contents, Civil Penalties

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• WAY OIL COMPANYentered 1994-06-03

  Primary law: RCRA

  Federal penalty: $3,000

Timeline (5 milestones)

• 1993-10-29Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 1993-10-29Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 1994-06-03Final Order Issued
• 1994-06-22Enforcement Action Closed
• 1994-06-22Compliance Achieved