EPA v. SIX POINT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Penalty assessed
$1,000
Case summary
ON 8/23/91 2 AUTHORIZED EPA INSPECTORS CONDUCTED AN INSPEC- TION TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE. OWNER/OPERATOR WAS PRESENT AT THE INSPECTION. INSPECTORS HAD OBSERVED THAT RESPONDENT HAD INPROPERLY AND WITHOUT A VALID PERMIT, STORED HAZARDOUS WASTE. THEY HAD ALSO FAILED TO NOTIFY OF TRANSPORT AND DID NOT HAVE A VALID LICENSE TO TRANSPORT. RESPONDENT WAS INDICTED ON 4 COUNTS. COUNT 1 FAILURE TO NOTIFY. COUNT 2 TSD OPERATIONS WITHOUT A VALID PERMIT. COUNT 3 TRANSPORTATION OF WITHOUT A MANIFEST. COUNT 4 CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE. TOTAL PROPOSED PENALTY IS $262,359.
Defendants (1)
- ADAM RYS-SIKORANamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
SIX POINT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
6935 HWY 10 W, MISSOULA, MT, 59801
Registry ID: 110006067950
Statutes cited
- RCRA 3008 — Res Conserv & Rec Act
Enforcement conclusions (1)
SIX POINT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGentered 1996-04-08
Primary law: RCRA
Federal penalty: $1,000
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 1993-09-29Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1993-09-29Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1996-04-08Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 49740
- Case number
- 08-1993-0306
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- RCR
- EPA region
- 08
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Res Conserv & Rec Act
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-1993-0306 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.