Skip to main content
08-1992-0211Administrative - FormalComplaint Filed/AO IssuedFY 1992· Region 08

EPA v. ARCO/SBC-BUTTE #22-OU#11

Case summary

IN 1989, EPA DETERMINED THAT SUFFICIENT DATA WERE AVAILABLE FOR THE SITE TO CONDUCT AN EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION, WHICH INCLUDES AN ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS STUDY, PUBLIC COMMENT, AND SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A NON TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION. PURSUANT TO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT, CERCLA 90-14, ARCO PERFORMED THE EE/CA STUDY, WHICH EXAMINED THE CLEAN UP ALTERNATIVES FOR THE SITE. PURSUANT TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE SAME ORDER, ARCO PREPARED AN ADDENDUM TO THE EE/CA STUDY WHICH EXAMINED POTENTIAL DISPOSAL AREAS, AS WELL AS INITIAL SITE PREPARATION AND SAMPLING ACTIVITIES. ON 12/30/91, EPA SELECTED THE CLEAN UP ALTERNATIVE FOR THE SITE IN AN ACTION MEMORANDUM. THE ACTION MEMORANDUM IS LOCATED IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FOR THE LOWER AREA ONE OPERABLE UNIT.

Defendants (3)

  • ANACONDANamed in complaint
  • ARCONamed in complaint
  • ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANYNamed in complaint

Facilities (1)

  • SILVER BOW CREEK/BUTTE AREA

    BUTTE TO MILLTOWN RESERVIOR, BUTTE, MT, 59750

    Registry ID: 110009339778

Statutes cited

  • CERCLA 106AImminent & Substantial Endangerment Order

Timeline (2 milestones)

  • 1992-05-20Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 1992-05-20Complaint Filed/Proposed Order

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
49196
Case number
08-1992-0211
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
CER
EPA region
08
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-1992-0211 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.