EPA v. CROXTON, JEFFREY
Voluntarily Dismissed After Filing
Case summary
REFERRAL FOR COLLECTION FROM USEPA, REGION VIII. THIS CASE INVOLVES A DEFAULT ORDER ISSUED AGAINST JEFFREY CROXTON A PESTICIDE APPLICATOR IN VIOLATION OF FIFRA. MR. CROXTON VIOLATED SEVERAL SERIOUS PROVISIONS OF FIFRA THAT EXPOSED HIS EMPLOYEES AND HIMSELF TO SUBSTANTIAL HEALTH CONSEQUENCES THE ONLY REASON THE PENALTY IS SO LOW IS THAT IT WAS CALCUL- ATED ON THE LOWEST BUSINESS CATEGORY INCOME SIZE, SINCE MR. CROXTON HAS A SMALL UNINCORPORATED BUSINESS.
Defendants (1)
- CROXTON, JEFFREYNamed in complaint
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12 — Fed. Insect, Fung & Rod Act
Enforcement conclusions (1)
**PROPOSED SETTLEMENT**
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (7 milestones)
- 1986-05-21Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1986-05-21Referred TO U.S. Attorney
- 1987-02-26Complaint Filed With Court
- 1987-06-23Final Order Lodged
- 1987-06-23Final Order Entered
- 1987-06-23Concluded
- 1987-06-23Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 47860
- Case number
- 08-1986-0066
- DOJ docket
- 1-8-39
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- TOX
- EPA region
- 08
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Fed. Insect, Fung & Rod Act
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 08-1986-0066 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.