EPA v. RON SCOTT DBA WHITE DOG PAINTING
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE RENOVATION, REPAIR AND PAINTING (RRP) RULE BY FAILING TO OBTAIN INITIAL FIRM CERTIFICATION FROM EPA, POST SIGNS CLEARLY DEFINING THE WORK AREA AND WARNING OCCUPANTS AND OTHER PERSONS NOT INVOLVED IN RENOVATION ACTIVITIES TO REMAIN OUTSIDE OF THE WORK AREA, AND COVER THE GROUND WITH PLASTIC SHEETING OR OTHER DISPOSABLE IMPERMEABLE MATERIAL EXTENDING 10 FEET BEYOND THE PERIMETER OF SURFACES UNDERGOING RENOVATION.
Defendants (1)
- RON SCOTT DBA WHITE DOG PAINTINGNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
WHITE DOG PAINTING
111 EAST 96TH STREET, KANSAS CITY, MO, 64114
Registry ID: 110064501515
Statutes cited
- TSCA 402C — Lead: RRP
Enforcement conclusions (1)
RON SCOTT DBA WHITE DOG PAINTINGentered 2016-09-26
Primary law: TSCA
Federal penalty: $1,246
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 2016-09-26Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2016-09-26Final Order Issued
- 2016-09-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2017-01-20Enforcement Action Closed
- 2017-01-20Pipeline Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3600813733
- Case number
- 07-2016-0333
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 07
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Lead: RRP
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 07-2016-0333 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.