EPA v. DURACELL, INC
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Case summary
IN 2000, EPA PERFORMED A FUND-LEAD TIME-CRITICAL REMOVAL OF BATTERY WASTE AND LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOIL. COST OF THE REMOVAL WAS APPROXIMATELY $1,000,000. WITNESS STATEMENTS LEAD TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE BATTERIES WERE FROM A FORMER BATTERY FACTORY LOCATED IN DUBUQUE, IOWA, APPROXIMATELY 1.5 MILES FROM THE SITE. THE BATTERY FACTORY WAS OPERATED FROM 1936-1957 BY GENERAL DRY BATTERIES, INC. THE CORPORATION WAS PURCHASED BY A CORPORATE PREDECESSOR OR OF DURACELL, INC IN 1956 AND SUBSEQUENTLY SHUT DOWN IN 1957. THE BATTERIES RECEIVED FROM GENERAL DRY BATTERIES WERE CRACKED AND PROCESSED BY AN INDIVIDUAL AT THE SITE TO RECLAIM THE ZINC. THE ZINC WAS SOLD AND INCORPORATED INTO A GALVANIZING PROCESS.
Defendants (1)
- DURACELL, INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
DURACELL, INC
11399 ROUTE 52 NORTH, SAGEVILLE, IA, 52001
Registry ID: 110009325042
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
Enforcement conclusions (1)
DURACELL, INCentered 2006-08-17
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (6 milestones)
- 2003-11-07Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 2003-11-12Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2006-06-08Final Order Lodged
- 2006-06-08Complaint Filed With Court
- 2006-08-17Final Order Entered
- 2007-10-18Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 108249
- Case number
- 07-2004-0018
- DOJ docket
- 90-11-2-08217
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 07
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Cost Recovery
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 07-2004-0018 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.