Skip to main content
07-2001-0122JudicialClosedFY 2001· Region 07

EPA v. U.S. V. ASARCO

Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery

Cost recovery

$1,734,890

Case summary

3/16/01: THIS WAS A CASH OUT CONSENT DECREE. THE FUNDS EPA RECOVERED WILL BE USED FOR A REMEDIAL ACTION THAT IS TO INSTALL A PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM THAT WILL PROVIDE ALTERNATE WATER TO ABOUT 400 PRIVATE RESIDENCES, WHOSE SHALLOW AQUIFER PRIVATE WATER WELLS HAVE BEEN CONTAMINATED OR ARE THREATENED WITH CONTAMINATION FROM THE ABANDONED, INA CTIVE LEAD AND MINING OPERATIONS, WHICH HAVE CAUSED LEAD LEVELS TO EXCEED SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT STANDARDS THROUGHOU T THE SHALLOW AQUIFER. THE AGENCY DETERMINED THAT IT IS TECHNICALLY IMPRACTICAL TO CLEAN UP THE AQUIFER BECAUSE OF ITS SIZE.

Defendants (1)

  • ASARCONamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • JASPER COUNTY SUPERFUND SITE

    JASPER COUNTY, PROSPERITY, MO, 64801

    Registry ID: 110010668072

Statutes cited

  • CERCLA 107ACost Recovery

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • U.S. V. ASARCOentered 2001-01-19

    Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (8 milestones)

  • 2000-10-16Final Order Lodged
  • 2000-10-16Referred To Dept Of Justice
  • 2000-10-16Complaint Filed With Court
  • 2001-01-19Final Order Entered
  • 2001-01-19Concluded
  • 2001-02-28Enforcement Action Closed
  • 2001-02-28Pipeline Closed
  • 2001-03-16Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
47274
Case number
07-2001-0122
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
CER
Branch
SPFD
EPA region
07
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Cost Recovery

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 07-2001-0122 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.