Skip to main content
06-2019-3311Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2019· Region 06

EPA v. Rubicon-Geismar, LA-RMP AOC-FY2019

Final Order No Penalty

Case summary

On January 6, 2018, there was a release of chlorine from the MDI-3 Process Unit.The chlorine/carbon-steel fire allowed approximately 200 pounds of chlorine.to be released to the atmosphere and secondary containment. The release of chlorine at the Facility on January 6, 2018, constituted an accidental release as that term is defined by Section 112(r)(2)(A) of the CAA, 42 USC 7412(r)(2)(A). Respondent's failure to operate at appropriate upper temperature limits related to the MDI-3 process was a violation of 40 CFR 68.65.

Defendants (1)

  • Rubicon LLCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (2)

  • RUBICON LLC - GEISMAR FACILITY

    9156 HWY 75, GEISMAR, LA, 70734

    Registry ID: 110000597373

  • RUBICON LLC - GEISMAR FACILITY

    9156 HWY 75, GEISMAR, LA, 70734

    Registry ID: 110000597373

Statutes cited

  • CAA 112[R][1]Prevention of Accidental Release/General Duty Clause
  • CAA 112[R][7]Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • Rubicon-Geismar, LA-RMP AOC-FY2019entered 2019-08-08

    Primary law: CAA

Timeline (5 milestones)

  • 2019-08-08Final Order Issued
  • 2019-09-10Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2020-10-13Air Resolved
  • 2020-10-13Compliance Achieved
  • 2021-10-26Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
3601964984
Case number
06-2019-3311
Lead agency
EPA
Branch
6ECDA
EPA region
06
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Prevention of Accidental Release/General Duty Clause

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2019-3311 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.