Skip to main content
06-2011-0302Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2011· Region 06

EPA v. Quest FIFRA SSURO

Final Order No Penalty

Case summary

Respondent was selling and distributing a pesticide misbranded, in that the label had a statement, design, or graphic representation that was false or misleading, which is a violation of FIFRA. Respondent agreed to take steps to label the product in compliance with FIFRA.

Defendants (1)

  • Quest Chemical Corp.Named in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (2)

  • QUEST CHEMICAL CORPORATION

    12255 FM 529, HOUSTON, TX, 77041

    Registry ID: 110000461642

  • QUESTVAPCO CORPORATION

    2001 E TOM GREEN ST, BRENHAM, TX, 77833

    Registry ID: 110045562725

Statutes cited

  • FIFRA 12A1EAdulterated/Misbranded

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • Quest FIFRA SSUROentered 2010-11-18

    Primary law: FIFRA

Timeline (4 milestones)

  • 2010-11-18Final Order Issued
  • 2010-11-18Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2011-03-18Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2011-11-18Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
2600005276
Case number
06-2011-0302
Lead agency
EPA
EPA region
06
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Adulterated/Misbranded

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2011-0302 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.