Skip to main content
06-2008-1143Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2008· Region 06

EPA v. CHAPARRAL - 5907-2

Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication

Case summary

VIOLATIONS: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) REGULATIONS REQUIRE THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF AN INJECTION WELL TO COMPLY WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS. RESPONDENT’S PERMIT FOR THE WELL INCLUDED IN THIS ENFORCEMENT ACTION LIMITS INJECTION TO 27,000 BARRELS PER MONTH. RESPONDENT HAS VIOLATED THIS LIMIT DURING THE PAST THREE YEARS. REMEDY: RESPONDENT SHALL COMPLY WITH PERMIT LIMITS. AUTHORIZATION TO INJECT FOR THE WELL WOULD BE SUSPENDED FOR THREE MONTHS FOR FUTURE VIOLATION OF PERMIT INJECTION VOLUME LIMITS. THE ORDER IS EFFECTIVE UNTIL NOVEMBER 1, 2009, AND WOULD BE EXTENDED FOR 12 MONTHS FOR VIOLATION OF THE ORDER. PENALTY: NONE

Defendants (1)

  • CHAPARRAL ENERGY, LLCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • OS5907 - WELL NO. MASON 1 (S)

    NW/4, SEC. 32, T25N, R 6E, FAIRFAX, OK, 74637

    Registry ID: 110024262180

Statutes cited

  • SDWA 1422/1423UIC Regulations Classes I - V
  • SDWA 1421UIC Regulations

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • CHAPARRAL - 5907-2entered 2008-09-19

    Primary law: SDWA

Timeline (5 milestones)

  • 2008-03-10Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2008-09-19Final Order Issued
  • 2008-09-19Compliance Achieved
  • 2008-09-23Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2009-11-24Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
1400007149
Case number
06-2008-1143
Lead agency
EPA
Branch
6EN-W
EPA region
06
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
UIC Regulations Classes I - V

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2008-1143 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.