Skip to main content
06-2008-1115Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2008· Region 06

EPA v. CHAPARRAL- BETTS - 1

Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication

Case summary

VIOLATIONS: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) REGULATIONS REQUIRE THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF AN INJECTION WELL TO COMPLY WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS. RESPONDENT’S PERMIT FOR THE WELL INCLUDED IN THIS ENFORCEMENT ACTION LIMITS INJECTION TO 84,000 BARRELS PER YEAR. RESPONDENT HAS VIOLATED THIS LIMIT DURING THE PAST THREE YEARS. REMEDY: SUBMIT PROCEDURES THAT RESPONDENT WILL FOLLOW TO COMPLY WITH PERMIT INJECTION VOLUME LIMIT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE ORDER. COMPLY WITH PERMIT LIMITS IN THE FUTURE. PERMIT WOULD BE SUSPENDED FOR THREE MONTHS FOR VIOLATION OF PERMIT INJECTION VOLUME LIMITS. PENALTY: NONE

Defendants (1)

  • CHAPARAL ENERGY, LLCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • OS5486 - WELL NO. 10-2 (E)

    NW/4, SEC. 27, T25N, R 8E, PAWHUSKA, OK, 74056

    Registry ID: 110020504060

Statutes cited

  • SDWA 1422/1423UIC Regulations Classes I - V
  • SDWA 1421UIC Regulations

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • CHAPARRAL- BETTS - 1entered 2008-03-10

    Primary law: SDWA

Timeline (4 milestones)

  • 2008-03-10Final Order Issued
  • 2008-03-10Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2008-03-19Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2008-09-19Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
600086384
Case number
06-2008-1115
Lead agency
EPA
Branch
6EN-W
EPA region
06
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
UIC Regulations Classes I - V

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2008-1115 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.