EPA v. MISSION CREEK - 1
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
VIOLATIONS: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) REGULATIONS REQUIRE THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF AN INJECTION WELL TO MONITOR INJECTION PRESSURE AND VOLUME AT LEAST MONTHLY AND TO REPORT MONITORING RESULTS TO THE EPA ANNUALLY. THE PERMIT FOR THE WELL ALSO REQUIRES THE ANNUAL REPORT TO INCLUDE A FLUID LEVEL MEASUREMENT FOR THE WELL IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. RESPONDENT VIOLATED OSAGE UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL REGULATIONS BY FAILING TO SUBMIT A REQUIRED ANNUAL OPERATION REPORT FOR AN INJECTION WELL FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007. REMEDY: SUBMIT OVERDUE ANNUAL OPERATION REPORT FOR THE WELL WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE ORDER. PENALTY: NONE
Defendants (1)
- MISSION CREEK OIL AND GAS, LLCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
OS5652 - WELL NO. 2 (S)
SW/4, SEC. 23, T 28N, R 11E, BOWRING, OK, 74009
Registry ID: 110015761665
Statutes cited
- SDWA 1422/1423 — UIC Regulations Classes I - V
- SDWA 1421 — UIC Regulations
Enforcement conclusions (1)
MISSION CREEK - 1entered 2007-11-28
Primary law: SDWA
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2007-11-28Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2007-11-28Final Order Issued
- 2007-12-04Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2008-02-04Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 600074841
- Case number
- 06-2008-1104
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- 6EN-W
- EPA region
- 06
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- UIC Regulations Classes I - V
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2008-1104 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.