EPA v. Lapetco, Inc.
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
Lapetco, Inc. Class 1 Administrative Complaint Docket No. CWA-06-2006-1784 VIOLATIONS: The Respondent's production well facility was a point source discharge of pollutants, specifically oil field brine (produced water), to the receiving waters of a tributary of the South Duck Creek, located in the Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 16 North, Range 12 East, Okmulgee County, Oklahoma. The discharge of brine was documented during a March 15, 2005, inspection. RELIEF: The Class I Complaint proposes up to a $32,500 penalty for the violations. An environmental restoration and protection SEP has been negotiated with Lapetco and the Consent Agreement and Final Order contains the details of the project. The amount of the SEP must be at least $27,000, and the final cash penalty required is $3,825. Technical Contact: Matt Rudolph 5-6434; Legal Contact: Jeffrey Clay 5-2245.
Defendants (1)
- Lapetco, Inc.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
NW-27-16-12
NW/4, SEC. 27, T 16, R 12E, SAND SPRINGS, OK, 74063
Registry ID: 110022322155
Statutes cited
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Lapetco, Inc.entered 2006-03-16
Primary law: CWA
Federal penalty: $3,825 · SEP: $38,362
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2005-12-30Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2006-02-07Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2006-03-16Final Order Issued
- 2009-08-07Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 168518
- Case number
- 06-2006-1784
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- 6EN-W
- EPA region
- 06
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2006-1784 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.