EPA v. M. C. Production & Drilling (Chaney Jones Lease)
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
Summary of Findings * Plan not certified by a professional engineer. * No management approval of plan. * No evidence of five-year review of plan by owner/operator. *Inadequate or no prediction of equipment failure which could result in discharges. * Plan has inadequate or no discussion of personnel and spill prevention procedure. *Inadequate or no flowline maintenance program.
Defendants (1)
- M. C. Production & DrillingNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
M. C. PRODUCTION AND DRILLING (CHANEY JONES LEASE)
P. O. BOX 9909, LONGVIEW, TX, 75608
Registry ID: 110022873602
Statutes cited
- CWA 311J — SPCC and/or Federal Response Plan Violations
Enforcement conclusions (1)
M. C. Production & Drilling (Chaney Jones Lease)entered 2005-05-25
Primary law: CWA
Federal penalty: $1,000
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2005-05-25Enforcement Action Closed
- 2005-05-25Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2005-05-25Final Order Issued
- 2005-06-06Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 148403
- Case number
- 06-2005-4337
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- 6SF-R
- EPA region
- 06
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- SPCC and/or Federal Response Plan Violations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2005-4337 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.