EPA v. International Asset Management, Inc., Hill Lease
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
Summary of Findings: No management approval of plan. Inadequate or no prediction of equipment failure which could dresult in discharges. Inspections and tests required by 40 CFR Part 112 are not in a accordance with written procudures developed for the facility. Written procedures and inspection records are not signed by appropriate supervisor or inspector. Written procedures and inspection records are not kept with the plan and are not maintained for three years. No designated person accountable for spill prevention.
Defendants (1)
- International Asset ManagementNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
INTERNATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. (HILL LEASE)
4371 PROVINCE LINE ROAD, PRINCETON, NJ, 08540
Registry ID: 110022327436
Statutes cited
- CWA 311J — SPCC and/or Federal Response Plan Violations
Enforcement conclusions (1)
International Asset Management, Inc., Hill Leaseentered 2005-03-18
Primary law: CWA
Federal penalty: $750
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2005-02-16Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2005-03-18Enforcement Action Closed
- 2005-03-18Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2005-03-18Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 139796
- Case number
- 06-2005-4331
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- 6SF-R
- EPA region
- 06
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- SPCC and/or Federal Response Plan Violations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2005-4331 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.