EPA v. Toney Oil Company
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
Tony Oil Company VIOLATIONS: The Respondent' tank battery facility was a point source discharge of pollutants, specifically brine, to the receiving waters of a tributary of Butler Creek, located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 27 North, Range 11 East, Osage County, Oklahoma. The discharge of brine was documented during a February 13, 2004 inspection. RELIEF: The Order specifies that the Respondent should also take steps to cease all discharges of pollutants and to neutralize the brine contaminated area surrounding and north of the tank battery by applying soil amendments to neutralize the sodium chloride. Additionally, the Order asks the Respondent to consider: (1) reconstruct the secondary containment; (2) remove fluids inside the facility on a regular basis; and (3) install an automatically activated sump pump. A follow-up inspection will determine the extent of compliance with the Order. Casey Luckett Snyder 3-2112.
Defendants (1)
- Toney Oil CompanyNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
NE-16-27-11
NE/4, SEC. 16, T 27N, R 11E, BOWRING, OK, 74009
Registry ID: 110017346095
Statutes cited
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Toney Oil Companyentered 2004-03-26
Primary law: CWA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2004-03-17Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2004-03-26Final Order Issued
- 2005-09-27Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 113533
- Case number
- 06-2004-2016
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- 6EN-W
- EPA region
- 06
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2004-2016 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.