EPA v. Seabrook Service Center

Case summary

** Inspections required by 40 CFR Part 112 are not in accordance with written procedures developed for the facility. ** Written procedures and a drecord of inspections are not signed by facility supervisor. ** Written procedures and a record of inspections are not made part of the plan. ** Written procedures and a record of inspections are not maintained for three years. ** No training on the operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent discharges. ** No training on the applicable laws, rules, and regulations. ** Spill prevention briefings are not scheduled and conducted periodically. ** Drainage from undiked areas nto into ponds, lagoons, or catchment basins, or no diversion systems to return spills to the facility. **Adequate records of drainage events are not maintained.

Defendants (1)

• Seabrook Service CenterNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• SEABROOK SERVICE CENTER

  2101 HUMBLE, SEABROOK, TX, 77586

  Registry ID: 110015768034

Statutes cited

• CWA 311J — SPCC and/or Federal Response Plan Violations

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• Seabrook Service Centerentered 2003-10-28

  Primary law: CWA

  Federal penalty: $800

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 2003-09-10Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2003-09-16Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2003-10-28Enforcement Action Closed
• 2003-10-28Final Order Issued