EPA v. THE VILLAGE

Case summary

1. SUBTITLE I OF THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT OF 1976 ( RCRA ), 42 U.S.C. SECTION 6912 ET SEQ. 2. THE VILLAGE 301 S. ECHO HOLDENVILLE, HUGHES COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 74848 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 9003 AND 9005 OF RCRA BY: 1) INADEQUATE OPERATION OF RELEASE DETECTION FOR TANKS; 2) INADEQUATE OPERATION OF LINE LEAK DETECTOR FUN- CTIONALITY TEST; 3) INADEQUATE CORROSION PROTECTION OF METAL PIPING; 4) CATHODIC PROTECTION MUST BR DESIGNED BY A N.A.C.E. SPECIALIST; 5) FAILURE TO CHECK IMPRESSED CUR- RENT SYSTEM EVERY 60 DAYS TO ENSURE EQUIPMENT IS WORKING PROPERLY; 6) FAILURE TO ENSURE THAT TANK IS STRUCTURALLY SOUND BEFORE INSTALLING CATHODIC PROTECTION; AND 7) CAT- HODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM MUST BE TESTED 6 MONTHS AFTER IN- STALLATION AND EVERY 3 YEARS AFTER. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SUBTITLE I OF RCRA, EPA ASSESS- ED THE RESPONDENT A CIVIL PENALTY OF $2,100 FOR THE VIO- LATIONS CITED AND ISSUED THE RESPONDENT A COMPLIANCE ORDER TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS.

Defendants (1)

• THE VILLAGENamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• VILLAGE

  301 S ECHO, HOLDENVILLE, OK, 74848

  Registry ID: 110013720857

Statutes cited

• RCRA 9005 — Inspections, Monitoring, Testing, Corrective Actions
• RCRA 9003 — UST Release Detection, Prevention, Correction Regulations

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• THE VILLAGE

  Primary law: RCRA

Timeline (2 milestones)

• 2002-03-08Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2002-05-09Enforcement Action Data Entered