Skip to main content
06-2002-3925Administrative - FormalComplaint Filed/AO IssuedFY 2002· Region 06

EPA v. JAMES' SERVICE STATION

Case summary

1. SUBTITLE I OF THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT OF 1976 ( RCRA ), 42 U.S.C. SECTION 6912 ET SEQ. 2. JAMES' SERVICE STATION 119 N. HINCKLEY HOLDENVILLE, HUGHES COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 74848 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 9005 OF RCRA BY: 1) INADEQUATE OPERATION OF GROUND WATER MONITORING; 2) CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM MUST BE DESIGNED BY A N.A.C.E. SPECIALIST; AND 3) CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM MUST BE TESTED 6 MONTHS AFTER INSTALLATION AND EVERY 3 YEARS AFTER THAT. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SUBTITLE I OF RCRA, EPA ASSESS- ED THE RESPONDENT A CIVIL PENALTY OF $750 FOR THE VIOLA- TIONS CITED AN ISSUED THE RESPONDENT A COMPLIANCE ORDER TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS.

Defendants (1)

  • JAMES' SERVICE STATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • JAMES' SVC STA

    119 N HINCKLEY, HOLDENVILLE, OK, 74848

    Registry ID: 110013720811

Statutes cited

  • RCRA 9005Inspections, Monitoring, Testing, Corrective Actions

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • JAMES' SERVICE STATION

    Primary law: RCRA

Timeline (2 milestones)

  • 2002-03-05Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2002-05-09Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
42060
Case number
06-2002-3925
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
RCR
Branch
6PD-U
EPA region
06
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Inspections, Monitoring, Testing, Corrective Actions

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2002-3925 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.