EPA v. JAMES' SERVICE STATION
Case summary
1. SUBTITLE I OF THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT OF 1976 ( RCRA ), 42 U.S.C. SECTION 6912 ET SEQ. 2. JAMES' SERVICE STATION 119 N. HINCKLEY HOLDENVILLE, HUGHES COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 74848 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 9005 OF RCRA BY: 1) INADEQUATE OPERATION OF GROUND WATER MONITORING; 2) CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM MUST BE DESIGNED BY A N.A.C.E. SPECIALIST; AND 3) CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM MUST BE TESTED 6 MONTHS AFTER INSTALLATION AND EVERY 3 YEARS AFTER THAT. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SUBTITLE I OF RCRA, EPA ASSESS- ED THE RESPONDENT A CIVIL PENALTY OF $750 FOR THE VIOLA- TIONS CITED AN ISSUED THE RESPONDENT A COMPLIANCE ORDER TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS.
Defendants (1)
- JAMES' SERVICE STATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
JAMES' SVC STA
119 N HINCKLEY, HOLDENVILLE, OK, 74848
Registry ID: 110013720811
Statutes cited
- RCRA 9005 — Inspections, Monitoring, Testing, Corrective Actions
Enforcement conclusions (1)
JAMES' SERVICE STATION
Primary law: RCRA
Timeline (2 milestones)
- 2002-03-05Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2002-05-09Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 42060
- Case number
- 06-2002-3925
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- RCR
- Branch
- 6PD-U
- EPA region
- 06
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Inspections, Monitoring, Testing, Corrective Actions
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2002-3925 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.