EPA v. AUSTIN COMMERCIAL, INC., AND PRENTISS PROPERTIES, INC.
Withdrawn by Region/State
Case summary
'''''''1. SECTION 309(G) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTION 1319(G). 2. AUSTIN COMMERCIAL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION PRENTISS PROPERTIRS, INC., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FACILITY: II BARTON SKYWAY 1601 SOUTH MOPAC AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 78746 3. RESPONDENTS WERE IN VIOLATION OF 301 OF THE CWA BY EACH DAY THAT THE RESPONDENTS CONDUCTED THE RELEVANT ACTIVI- TIES AND OPERATED THE FACILITY WITHOUT NPDES PERMIT COV- ERAGE. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 309(G) OF THE CWA, EPA PROPOSED A CIVIL PENALTY OF $27,500 FOR THE VIOLATION CITED.'
Defendants (2)
- AUSTIN COMMERCIAL, INC.Named in complaint
- PRENTISS PROPERTIES, INC.Named in complaint
Facilities (1)
II BARTON SKYWAY CONSTR SITE
1601 S MOPAC, AUSTIN, TX, 78746
Registry ID: 110009708067
Statutes cited
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
**PROPOSED SETTLEMENT**
Primary law: CWA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2001-11-26Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2001-11-27Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2002-07-23Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 41896
- Case number
- 06-2002-1727
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- Branch
- 6RC-E
- EPA region
- 06
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2002-1727 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.