Skip to main content
06-2002-1727Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2002· Region 06

EPA v. AUSTIN COMMERCIAL, INC., AND PRENTISS PROPERTIES, INC.

Withdrawn by Region/State

Case summary

'''''''1. SECTION 309(G) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTION 1319(G). 2. AUSTIN COMMERCIAL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION PRENTISS PROPERTIRS, INC., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FACILITY: II BARTON SKYWAY 1601 SOUTH MOPAC AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 78746 3. RESPONDENTS WERE IN VIOLATION OF 301 OF THE CWA BY EACH DAY THAT THE RESPONDENTS CONDUCTED THE RELEVANT ACTIVI- TIES AND OPERATED THE FACILITY WITHOUT NPDES PERMIT COV- ERAGE. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 309(G) OF THE CWA, EPA PROPOSED A CIVIL PENALTY OF $27,500 FOR THE VIOLATION CITED.'

Defendants (2)

  • AUSTIN COMMERCIAL, INC.Named in complaint
  • PRENTISS PROPERTIES, INC.Named in complaint

Facilities (1)

  • II BARTON SKYWAY CONSTR SITE

    1601 S MOPAC, AUSTIN, TX, 78746

    Registry ID: 110009708067

Statutes cited

  • CWA 301NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • **PROPOSED SETTLEMENT**

    Primary law: CWA

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 2001-11-26Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2001-11-27Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2002-07-23Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
41896
Case number
06-2002-1727
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
WAT
Branch
6RC-E
EPA region
06
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-2002-1727 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.