EPA v. BAMA PIE FACILITY
EPA Did Not Pursue
Case summary
1. VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO THE EPA'S POLICY GUID- ANCE, INCENTIVES FOR SELF-POLICING: DISCOVERY, DISCLOS- URE, CORRECTION AND PREVENTION OF VIOLATION . 2. BAMA PIE FACILITY 2745 EAST 11TH STREET TULSA, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 74104 3. RESPONDENT, UNDER THE SELF-POLICING POLICY, DISCLOSED A POSSIBLE VIOLATION OF SUBCHAPTER VI OF THE CAA. THE RE- SPONDENT DISCLOSED A LEAK OF R-12 REFRIGERANT FROM ITS FACILITY DURING REPAIRS. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO THE SELF-POLICING POLICY, EPA WILL REVIEW THE RESPONDENT'S DISCLOSURE, CORRECTION AND PREVENTION OF RECURRENCE, AND WILL MAKE A DETERMINATION AS TO THE RESPONDENT'S QUALIFICATIONS TO THE SELF-POLIC- ING POLICY, AND IF EPA WILL SEEK GRAVITY-BASED PENALTIES OR NOT.
Defendants (1)
- BAMA PIE FACILITYNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
THE BAMA COMPANIES, INC.
2745 E 11TH ST, TULSA, OK, 741043913
Registry ID: 110010695514
Statutes cited
- CAA SUBCHP6 — Clean Air Act
Enforcement conclusions (1)
BAMA PIE FACILITYentered 2001-05-11
Primary law: CAA
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 1999-08-10Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1999-08-13Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2001-05-11Final Order Issued
- 2001-05-11Compliance Achieved
- 2001-05-11Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 39408
- Case number
- 06-1999-0744
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- AIR
- Branch
- 6RC-E
- EPA region
- 06
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- Yes
- Primary statute
- Clean Air Act
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-1999-0744 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.