EPA v. DOUBLE DIAMOND PETROLEUM, INC. - EDNA TUCKER TANK BATTERY

Case summary

1. SECTION 311(B)(6)(B)(I) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTION 1321(B)(6)(B)(I), AS AMENDED BY THE OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990. 2. DOUBLE DIAMOND PETROLEUM, INC. 325 NORTH SAINT PAUL, SUITE 2900 DALLAS, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 75201 FACILITY: EDNA TUCKER TANK BATTERY, ANDERSON COUNTY, TX. 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 311 OF THE CWA BY (1) ACCUMULATED OIL IN THE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYS- TEM(S) IS NOT PICKED UP AND RETURNED TO STORAGE OR PROP- ERLY DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS, (2) TANK MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE OIL STORED AND THE CONDITIONS OF STORAGE, AND (3) SECONDARY CONTAINMENT APPEARS TO BE GROSSLY INADEQUATE TANKS AND CENTRAL TREATING INSTALLATIONS. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 311(B)(6)(B)(I) OF THE CWA, EPA ISSUED A COMPLAINT AND EXPEDITED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT TO THE RESPONDENT. EPA ASSESSED THE RESPONDENT A CIVIL PENALTY OF $1,000 FOR THE VIOLATIONS CITED, AND REQUIRED THE RESPONDENT TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS.

Defendants (1)

• DOUBLE DIAMOND PETROLEUM, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• EDNA TUCKER TANK BATTERY, ANDERSON COUNTY, TX.

  325 N SAINT PAUL ST, DALLAS, TX, 752016852

  Registry ID: 110010782297

Statutes cited

• CWA 311 — Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• DOUBLE DIAMOND PETROLEUM, INC.

  Primary law: CWA

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 1998-08-27Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 1998-08-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2001-02-01Enforcement Action Closed