EPA v. LAMAY CORPORATION

Case summary

1. SECTION 311(B)(6)(B)(I) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTION 1321(B)(6)(B)(I), AS AMENDED BY THE OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990. 2. LAMAY CORPORATION P.O. BOX 392 ROSENBERG, FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS 77471 FACILITY: MUSTANG ISLAND STATE PARK, TRACT 2 SEPARATION STATION 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 311 OF THE CWA BY 1) BY NOT MAINTAINING SPCC PLAN ON-SITE, 2) WRITTEN PRO- CEDURES AND A RECORD OF INSPECTION ARE NOT SIGNED BY THE APPROPRIATE SUPERVISOR OR INSPECTOR, 3) WRITTEN PROCED- URES AND A RECORD OF INSPECTIONSARE NOT MADE PART OF THE SPCC PLAN, 4) VISUAL TANK INSPECTIONS ARE NOT CONDUCTED PERIODICALLY BY APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL, AND DO NOT INCLUDE FOUNDATION AND SUPPORTS, AND 5) SPCC PLAN HAS INADEQUATE OR NO DISCUSSION OF OIL PRODUCTION FACILITIES. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 311(B)(6)(B)(I) OF THE CWA, EPA PROPOSES A CIVIL PENALTY OF $550 AND ISSUED A COMPLIANCE ORDER ORDER REQUIRING THE RESPONDENT TO COR- RECT THE VIOLATIONS CITED.

Defendants (1)

• LAMAY CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• LAMAY CORP

  PO BOX 392, ROSENBERG, TX, 77471

  Registry ID: 110010698138

Statutes cited

• CWA 311 — Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• LAMAY CORPORATIONentered 1998-05-08

  Primary law: CWA

  Federal penalty: $550

Timeline (5 milestones)

• 1998-03-05Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 1998-03-09Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 1998-05-08Final Order Issued
• 1998-05-08Compliance Achieved
• 1998-05-08Enforcement Action Closed