Skip to main content
06-1997-0058Administrative - FormalClosedFY 1997· Region 06

EPA v. CIMARRON ENGINEEERING CORP. (TX0114502)

Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication

Case summary

1. SECTION 309(A)(3) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTION 1319(A)(3). 2. STEVE PAKEBUSCH CIMARRON ENGINEERING CORPORATION COX BAY - ST 41 P.O. BOX 1536 KINGSVILLE, TEXAS 78364 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301 OF THE CWA BY DISCHARGING PRODUCED WATER AND SAND INTO WATERS OF THE U.S. THAT EXCEED THE EFFLUENT LIMITS. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 309(A)(3) OF THE CWA, EPA ISSUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (AO) ORDERING THE RE- SPONDENT TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE FACILITIES SO AS TO DISCHARGE EFFLUENT WHICH DOES NOT EXCEED THE EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS.

Defendants (1)

  • STEVE PAKEBUSCHNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • CIMARRON ENGINEERING CORP

    205 S 10TH ST, KINGSVILLE, TX, 783635660

    Registry ID: 110010653382

Statutes cited

  • CWA 301NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • CIMARRON ENGINEERING CORPORATIONentered 1996-12-18

    Primary law: CWA

Timeline (5 milestones)

  • 1996-12-18Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 1996-12-18Final Order Issued
  • 1997-01-22Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 1999-07-14Compliance Achieved
  • 1999-07-14Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
36890
Case number
06-1997-0058
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
WAT
Branch
6EN-L
EPA region
06
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-1997-0058 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.