Skip to main content
06-1996-0512Administrative - FormalClosedFY 1996· Region 06

EPA v. CONAGRA POULTRY CO-NATCHITOCHE

Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication

Compliance action

$4,000,000

Case summary

1. SECTION 309 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ). 2. CONAGRA POULTRY CO-NATCHITOCHE P.O. BOX 1008 NATCHITOCHE, LOUISIANA 71457 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301 OF THE CWA BY EXCEEDING THE EFFLUENT LIMITS OF ITS PERMIT. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 309 OF THE CWA, EPA IS- SUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (AO) ORDERING THE RESPOND- ENT TO CORRECT AND PREVENT THE VIOLATIONS AND COMPLY WITH THE EFFLUENT LIMITS OF ITS PERMIT.

Defendants (1)

  • CONAGRA POULTRY CO-NATCHITOCHENamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (2)

  • CONAGRA POULTRY COMPANY

    7088 HIGHWAY 1 SOUTH BYPASS, NATCHITOCHES, LA, 71457

    Registry ID: 110000450645

  • CONAGRA POULTRY COMPANY

    7088 HIGHWAY 1 SOUTH BYPASS, NATCHITOCHES, LA, 71457

    Registry ID: 110000450645

Statutes cited

  • CWA 301NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • CONAGRA POULTRY CO-NATCHITOCHEentered 1996-07-24

    Primary law: CWA

Timeline (4 milestones)

  • 1996-07-24Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 1996-07-24Final Order Issued
  • 1996-10-10Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2000-03-17Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
36798
Case number
06-1996-0512
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
WAT
Branch
6EN-L
EPA region
06
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-1996-0512 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.